Little and large

[davholla]

Normally 10 mm is not large
Silverfish Lepisma saccharinum from the house
The real size is 10.34 mm, magnification is 1.4
IMG_2267_Silverfishv2 by davholla2002, on Flickr
But compared to about 0.3 mm it is
Mite, on a piece of wood, TQ 40100 68716
The real size is 0.32 mm, magnification is 5.46. For some reason it looks worse on the forum than flickr not sure why.
Not that good a photo but it was very small and live.
IMG_2298_Mitev2 by davholla2002, on Flickr
IMG_2298_Mitev2 by davholla2002, on Flickr
I think Harlequin Ladybird TQ 40104 68783 a stack of 3 photos
The real size is 5.29 mm, magnification is 1.68
IMG_2173_Ladybirdv2 by davholla2002, on Flickr
Mite from the allotment, TQ 40104 68783

The real size is 1.04 mm, magnification is 5.18
IMG_2253_Mitev2 by davholla2002, on Flickr

Hoverfly
IMG_2181_Hoverflyv2 by davholla2002, on Flickr

 

[Cobra]

Nice silverfish David

Please revisit the red X's you are trying to post these way over the permitted sizes.

 

[Gav.]

Nice set David, well done with the tiny Mite

 

[davholla]

Nice set David, well done with the tiny Mite

Thank you I just wish the photo were better here than in flickr (well I wish it were better full stop) but there seems to be a big disrepancy.

 

[Gav.]

Thank you I just wish the photo were better here than in flickr (well I wish it were better full stop) but there seems to be a big disrepancy.

Still a great shot when size is taken into account and 'only' using a camera not micro scope

 

[Cobra]

but there seems to be a big disrepancy.

Dave, its because you have massively up sized them when posting.
But even on flickr a lot of them are very grainy...

 

[davholla]

IMG_2298_Mitev2 by davholla2002, on Flickr

 

[davholla]

Dave, its because you have massively up sized them when posting.
But even on flickr a lot of them are very grainy...

Thanks for that - I will use a smaller size in future for ones which have been cropped. I wonder if I had taken them with a different camera they could take cropping more. I will have to do some experiments and ask.

None of them look grainy to me on flickr but maybe that is because I only have a standard laptop screen or something.

 

[Cobra]

None of them look grainy to me on flickr

Screen grabbed from your flickr and at the size it is shown, there.

How does this look? it looks just the same to me, as there and here.

 

[davholla]

Screen grabbed from your flickr and at the size it is shown, there.

How does this look? it looks just the same to me, as there and here.




View attachment 342315

No you are right it is grainy but I think I know how to stop it - although saying that my flash support has a bit of a mind of its own.
The MPE65 is a bit of Great Irritating Remarkable Lens - I am sure this an acronym there but I can't quite see it.

 

[K9Kirk]

I like #1 the most.

 

[GardenersHelper]

Interesting set David. I think #1 looks very good.

 

[davholla]

Interesting set David. I think #1 looks very good.

Thanks I wasn't sure about the white container (I didn't have much choice it was too quick otherwise) but now I like it.