Maybe it`s worth a before and after photo , or the very least the info on the settings used ? Nice photo , with lots of detail and control on the highlights anyways .
It's not at all surprising that a very bright scene is "underexposed"... the system adjusts to average grey.surprisingly it's slightly under-exposed for a big white blob and blue sky - but image was "noisy" at ISO 250 which again is surprising
It's not at all surprising that a very bright scene is "underexposed"... the system adjusts to average grey.
Blue skies are almost always noisy, because only 25% of the photosites record blue centric (shadows are also primarily blue). That leaves 75% of the photosites "guessing," and they guess wrong a lot... magenta (red/blue) seems to be the primary color noise; probably due to near IR (I'm just guessing).
Looks like a little masking error on/in front of the left wing...
Amazing what all these new enhancement programmes can bring out , you still need to know what your doing with them , mostly above me . sk66 may as well been talking some Alien language to me . As said the end result turned out nice .