Trees

[sirch]

Not sure if this is landscape or nature but they feel more like they belong in here. Mix of ICM and photochop

#1
Tree1 by Chris H, on Flickr

#2
Tree3 by Chris H, on Flickr

#3
Tree4 by Chris H, on Flickr

#4
Tree6 by Chris H, on Flickr

#5
Tree7 by Chris H, on Flickr

#6
Tree8 by Chris H, on Flickr

#7
Tree9 by Chris H, on Flickr

#9
Tree10 by Chris H, on Flickr

 

[ancient_mariner]

Just a minor thing Chris, but I'd probably place the first image between 6 & 7 or slightly later. When viewing the set initially I thought it seemed really out of place, and doesn't help progress through the set.

Interesting bunch, and a good alternative & non-cliched view of trees.

 

[sirch]

Just a minor thing Chris, but I'd probably place the first image between 6 & 7 or slightly later. When viewing the set initially I thought it seemed really out of place, and doesn't help progress through the set.

Interesting bunch, and a good alternative & non-cliched view of trees.

Thanks Tony, I see what you mean, it's a beech and the rest are mainly ash so may be it doesn't fit in the set at all

 

[sirch]

I just remembered that there is a creative photos section, may be this would be better in there?

 

[ancient_mariner]

Thanks Tony, I see what you mean, it's a beech and the rest are mainly ash so may be it doesn't fit in the set at all

Y'know, with a bit of blur & processing I could tell it was a tree.....

 

[petersmart]

I like tree 8

 

[Harlequin565]

Saw that last one come through on Flickr and fav'd it immediately. Very much my cuppa. I'm in the "more movement" camp for ICM as I think it can give a real dreamlike surreal quality to the subject(s).

 

[sirch]

Thanks @petersmart and @Harlequin565

 

[JohnFar]

9 and 10 have (for me!) the best composition and amount of blur. I think it's because there are more trunks.

 

[West Camera]

I like the effects you applied to 7 and 8. Both are very unique and interesting.