85mm 1.4? Ooooo, sounds fab!!!
There's also the Canon 85mm f1.2 if you're feeling particularly generous towards yourself!
85mm 1.4? Ooooo, sounds fab!!!
LOL! I ALWAYS feel generous towards myself. However, my finances dictate otherwise.There's also the Canon 85mm f1.2 if you're feeling particularly generous towards yourself!
LOL! I ALWAYS feel generous towards myself. However, my finances dictate otherwise.
The 85mm is coming tomorrow...... *excited*
Give me six months and I'll be wanting my next toy!
I have the 85mm 1.8 & it is an excellent lens
Give me six months and I'll be wanting my next toy!
You can find the Sigma 85mm f1.4 for about £400 s/h. It's a good lens too, but much heavier than the Canon 85 1.8.I have a manual 85 f1.4 - have a look at my samyang album on Flickr - but really want an AF one. I bought mine for 300 new but an af version will be between 600-1100 depending on which I go for. A long wait yet.....
LOL! I ALWAYS feel generous towards myself. However, my finances dictate otherwise.
The 85mm is coming tomorrow...... *excited*
Give me six months and I'll be wanting my next toy!
No. It's a constant urge, TBH.6 whole months??!!!
Tip - shoot it at around 2.2 for the best bokeh and sharpness 1.8 is quite soft
What I don't get, is why cheap lenses are built for full frame cameras? I mean, if I bought a body for £1k plus, I wouldn't be buying cheap(ish) lenses for it! Just a thought.
In terms of resolving, yes, but the corners need to do more of course.I suppose another reason for FF lenses being cheaper and easier to make is that they don't have to work as hard as lenses for smaller systems.
Pardon?In terms of resolving, yes, but the corners need to do more of course.
Full frame lenses have a larger image circle than crop, the far corners are not seen on the latter.Pardon?
LOL!!Pics or it didn't happen...