- Messages
- 3,063
- Name
- Dean
- Edit My Images
- Yes
canon vs nikon.. <mFT
Pfffft, mFT < APS-C CSC MILC EVIL ASAP PDQ RTFM YMMV TLA TTFN
Or something like that.
canon vs nikon.. <mFT
pffff...?? yeah, right m8. keep thinking this way. good luck.Pfffft, mFT < APS-C CSC MILC EVIL ASAP PDQ RTFM YMMV TLA TTFN
Or something like that.
pffff...?? yeah, right m8. keep thinking this way. good luck.
lol, x vs x vs x.. discussion has no make sense dou to personal preference and this discussion is good example haha. its close to trying to convince someone bananas are better than oranges..Oh noes, a random on the interwebs is dismissive of my opinion, whatever shall I do? Surely my time as a person who enjoys photographamy and banter is all but done and I must away!
Better, cupcake?
lol, x vs x vs x.. discussion has no make sense dou to personal preference and this discussion is good example haha. its close to trying to convince someone bananas are better than oranges..
take care.
lol, x vs x vs x.. discussion has no make sense dou to personal preference and this discussion is good example haha. its close to trying to convince someone bananas are better than oranges..
take care.
this is how I take it, a joke. relax guys@sosen13
This is a joke thread. Take a look at the first post, and then look at the questions in the poll... then reflect.... and feel stupid.
A joke? A JOKE?
Do you guys all really think this subject is funny and worth making light of? I've just sold my entire stock of Canon gear on ebay because I had to change system. I really don't want to hear people making fun of the serious decisions us hobbyist photographers take.
My photos were ok, but just a bit "lacking" so I popped into Dixons to have a chat with the experts who sell more cameras than I've had hot dinners. Anyway, after discussing the merits of the various sports exhaust options for Vauxhall Corsas, we got onto the serious subject of photography. Kevin agreed with me that there are only two brands worth considering: Canon and Nikon. I explained my dilemma: the burst mode on my Canon was really starting to feel sluggish and I needed more megapixels. We debated - at some length - the merits of in-camera versus in-body image stabilisation and decided for an extra quarter of a stop, it was absolutely worth getting the latest VR system.
So I've gone Nikon. That's my mind made up and I'm now a proud owner of a wonderful full-frame Nikon with a few lovely VR lenses. I just hope Canon isn't the first to release a 40MP+ camera otherwise I'll have to switch back again...
A joke? A JOKE?
Do you guys all really think this subject is funny and worth making light of? I've just sold my entire stock of Canon gear on ebay because I had to change system. I really don't want to hear people making fun of the serious decisions us hobbyist photographers take.
My photos were ok, but just a bit "lacking" so I popped into Dixons to have a chat with the experts who sell more cameras than I've had hot dinners. Anyway, after discussing the merits of the various sports exhaust options for Vauxhall Corsas, we got onto the serious subject of photography. Kevin agreed with me that there are only two brands worth considering: Canon and Nikon. I explained my dilemma: the burst mode on my Canon was really starting to feel sluggish and I needed more megapixels. We debated - at some length - the merits of in-camera versus in-body image stabilisation and decided for an extra quarter of a stop, it was absolutely worth getting the latest VR system.
So I've gone Nikon. That's my mind made up and I'm now a proud owner of a wonderful full-frame Nikon with a few lovely VR lenses. I just hope Canon isn't the first to release a 40MP+ camera otherwise I'll have to switch back again...
Definitely Nikon because otherwise I would be compromised not owning the best.
Also, Nikon seem more innovative.
Also, I disagree that this thread should be irrelevant. Whilst the final image is certainly the object and a good shooter may well manage with a pinhole cabinet, nevertheless the tactile enjoyment of shooting is very important for many photographers.
Thats strange, because I was on the verge of doing the opposite with advice from PC World... Your experience has severely made me reconsider! Anyone want some Cannon lenses I need gone?
Said the CEO of the Nikon corporation.Definitely Nikon because otherwise I would be compromised not owning the best.
Also, Nikon seem more innovative.
Also, I disagree that this thread should be irrelevant. Whilst the final image is certainly the object and a good shooter may well manage with a pinhole cabinet, nevertheless the tactile enjoyment of shooting is very important for many photographers.
I'm halfway there- I've grown a beard.we all know you aren't a proper photographer unless you use leica - this has established by beardy men in tweed trousers at a certain sort of photography club up and down the land over and over again.
Yup, I've got an old kodak camera in still use sometimes.Kodak anyone ? Why the hell not its just as irrelevant in this thread as anything else.
Thats strange, because I was on the verge of doing the opposite with advice from PC World... Your experience has severely made me reconsider! Anyone want some Cannon lenses I need gone?
Definitely Nikon because otherwise I would be compromised not owning the best.
Also, Nikon seem more innovative.
Also, I disagree that this thread should be irrelevant. Whilst the final image is certainly the object and a good shooter may well manage with a pinhole cabinet, nevertheless the tactile enjoyment of shooting is very important for many photographers.
Canon = Man Utd shirt
Nikon = Chelsea shirt
You see more of the former but I wouldn't be seen in either.
we all know you aren't a proper photographer unless you use leica ...
And if I buy a Nikon LTM lens to use on it, will my camera explode?