- Messages
- 31
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I currently have a Sigma 100-300mm f4 which I use to shoot some sport and wildlife. I am thinking of getting something with a little more reach and I wondered if anyone had any experience with both the Nikon 80-400mm f4.5/5.6 and the Nikon 200-500mm f5.6. The 80-400mm is available used at around £300 which is significantly less than the 200-500mm. Is the 200-500mm worth the extra cost?
The 80-400mm is much smaller/lighter and the focal range would be great for sport as it covers such a broad range.
The 80-400mm is much smaller/lighter and the focal range would be great for sport as it covers such a broad range.