- Messages
- 3,831
- Edit My Images
- No
There's a mint ZF + 50mm f2 APO Voigtlander in the classifieds.
First test of the 3D tracking of the Z8 today, this is a 2MP Snapbridge image SOOC camera, interesting to see what the finished image looks like, The tracking is phenomenal. Just wish the feature came out this time last year.....
View attachment 444471
I had an early iteration of this lens when I first bought into Z cameras, the Z6. Optically it was fine, but personally I found it a bit clunky and out-of-balance with the FTZ. As indeed I find more or less any lens using the adaptor.Anyone have experience of using the newer version Tamron 17-35mm lens on Z bodies with the FTZii.?... SWMBO has opened her purse and okayed a ZF for me at the end of the month. I was planning on keeping the 12-28mm I have for the ZFC/Z8 but as I'll be selling the ZFC I don't think there's much point in keeping the DX lens anymore with two FF bodies.
I cant afford the 14-30 or 17-28mm lenses at present and the Tamron 17-35mm would only be used for occasional use.
I used an F mount Tamron 17-35 OSD quite a bit on a Z8 with FTZ2 and had reasonably decent results with it before I bit the bullet and bought a Z mount WA zoom late last year. Used mostly on a tripod for landscapes. Anything in particular you want to know?Anyone have experience of using the newer version Tamron 17-35mm lens on Z bodies with the FTZii.?... SWMBO has opened her purse and okayed a ZF for me at the end of the month. I was planning on keeping the 12-28mm I have for the ZFC/Z8 but as I'll be selling the ZFC I don't think there's much point in keeping the DX lens anymore with two FF bodies.
I cant afford the 14-30 or 17-28mm lenses at present and the Tamron 17-35mm would only be used for occasional use.
I had a older version on my then D750 and for the price it performed okay. I'm looking at the OSD version now.I had an early iteration of this lens when I first bought into Z cameras, the Z6. Optically it was fine, but personally I found it a bit clunky and out-of-balance with the FTZ. As indeed I find more or less any lens using the adaptor.
I don't mind using the FTZ as I use my Sigma ART 24-35 f2 a lot with it. Although heavy, for the amount of times I do use it the weight becomes a little bit more bearable.I used an F mount Tamron 17-35 OSD quite a bit on a Z8 with FTZ2 and had reasonably decent results with it before I bit the bullet and bought a Z mount WA zoom late last year. Used mostly on a tripod for landscapes. Anything in particular you want to know?
AF is really good, fast and accurate but then that's my experience with every lens I've tried with the FTZ. Image quality is a little more subjective - reasonably decent I'd say, but it doesn't render as nicely as either the better WA Nikon F or Z mount lenses I've used. That said, it isn't an expensive lens and I do think it punches above it's weight in that regard. I swapped because I wanted something wider and because I didn't find the Tamron that great wide open for astro/night stuffI had a older version on my then D750 and for the price it performed okay. I'm looking at the OSD version now.
I don't mind using the FTZ as I use my Sigma ART 24-35 f2 a lot with it. Although heavy, for the amount of times I do use it though the weight becomes a little bit more bearable.
I just want to know what the IQ is like with the lens, AF etc.... I would guess I will use it more on the ZF when I get it rather than my Z8....Was there any particular reason why you moved to the Z mount version lens?
Thanks both for your replies.
Which WA angle did you decide to get, I guess the f2.8 version for your Astro/Night stuff....Looking at the finances again I could probably push for the 14-30mm F4 Z lens second-hand. Bit undecided for the amount of WA stuff I photo. I'm Ambulant disabled so most of my photos are taken from my mobility scooter and I will never climb mountains any time soon.AF is really good, fast and accurate but then that's my experience with every lens I've tried with the FTZ. Image quality is a little more subjective - reasonably decent I'd say, but it doesn't render as nicely as either the better WA Nikon F or Z mount lenses I've used. That said, it isn't an expensive lens and I do think it punches above it's weight in that regard. I swapped because I wanted something wider and because I didn't find the Tamron that great wide open for astro/night stuff