Photo stolen for website. Advice on legal language please.

[DemiLion]

You will have to explain your comments? I fully understand copyright

And as for insinuating we are not commercial photographers, what's all that about?

If 8 staff, 250+k turnover, our own (not rented) 6500sq feet fully equipped studio, some of the biggest clients in the uk, is a "so called" commercial photography business then I can't wait until Eric are a proper one.

Certainly. You've alluded to commercial work from what I've seen, but never fully stated that you are a commercial photographer- hence 'so called'. It's a turn of phrase rather than an insult.

However, your views on defending copyright are frankly pants.

 

[Jack Field]

Thanks everyone. I'll get legal advice before I potentially mess this up.
Here's the photo by the way;

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Eurocopter-EC-135T-2/1953708/L/&sid=b475d5cccba0eaddbad167057089ec34

They have edited the copyright mark at the bottom of the image off the image they used.

 

[Steep]

I'd move the mark nearer the middle of your images in future, makes it harder for them to disguise it's origins.

 

[ESRSM]

Thanks everyone. I'll get legal advice before I potentially mess this up.
Here's the photo by the way;

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Eurocopter-EC-135T-2/1953708/L/&sid=b475d5cccba0eaddbad167057089ec34

They have edited the copyright mark at the bottom of the image off the image they used.

Wait, it's still on their servers so it hasn't technically been took down.

 

[OutLore]

Wait, it's still on their servers so it hasn't technically been took down.

I think Airliners.net is where they took it from.