But why would we loose it just because t***ter is having a flap?
I was responding to the thread title, which reflected a much wider concern, often discussed, about the future of street photography, and to other posters who were suggesting street photography had little value, or interest.
As it is, Twitter seem to have a very restricted set of circumstance when they will pull an image, which "on the face of it" are difficult to argue against. Which is why I said I supported what they were trying to do. I obviously, should have been more explicit about saying if this was all that was going to happen, I didn't see it as a direct threat
I can't really comment on social media as it's not somewhere I look to for photographs, and I don't really know much about it. There are certainly some very mixed views about it's value to photographers.
Personally, I still prefer books of photographs, to anything online, but I do have a sub to the online street photography magazine "The Inspired Eye"
https://www.theinspiredeye.net/
I also subscribe to the online magazine "OnLandscape" which helps me decide which books to buy
On Landscape is a subscription based bi-weekly magazine dedicated to landscape photography from romantic to contemporary
www.onlandscape.co.uk
And I follow some websites which is how I knew about the link I posted in my original comment.