Nikon D750 & D780

Anyone any recommendations for a wired remote? I had the Nikon one and lost it last week. If a cheaper one works well it will do me fine.
 
snerkler said:
Yeah, the other tog had a 50mm f1.8 and faired better. I was going to invest in a 50mm f1.4 instead of the 24-70mm and part of me wished I had, but I don't think I'd have been happy whatever ;)

I might post one showing the great chuffing windows I was shooting against tomorrow. Neither camera liked shooting towards those (it was extremely bright) and both struggled to focus at times, even when the fighters were stationary between rounds :eek: And even if they did focus they're so washed out/lacking in contrast due to the really strong backlight.

But I'll just put it down to experience, and you never know maybe I'll find a couple of shots that work (y)
Click to expand...

I believe you would not be happy with the 50mm f1.4 so don't waste your cash lol
 
minnnt said:
So you spent most of the day comparing noise and fannying around with 100% crops then add grain in PP? You're f*****g nuts dude. FFS.

Edit: :)
Click to expand...

Must of had his lab coat on all day
 
phil_b said:
Anyone any recommendations for a wired remote? I had the Nikon one and lost it last week. If a cheaper one works well it will do me fine.
Click to expand...
Phil i have one along with other bits i am going to advertise,do you want me to put it in the ads
Also got an wireless remote,the wired is a shoot and the wireless one some foreign make ,i tested both when they came 2 weeks ago and they are brand new,sold my nikon so never used them i shall put them in the ads £7 for the pair del.now
 
Last edited:
siblingchris said:
I've had noiseware pro standalone for years. Worked wonders on some images. Slightly miffed that to get a plugin version for LR or PSE I'd now have to pay more though

Anyway, I've come to the conclusion that less noise doesn't always make a better photo, or necessarily a perfectly sharp one. Those boxing images, I like that last b&w one tbh. It tells a story, the look on the guys face as he's punched, the room, the unexcited audience...

If we are trying to take photos rather than create images then they don't need to be perfect. We don't live in a perfect world....what's today's buzzword? Curators? Maybe we are curators of time, capturing moments
Click to expand...

Some of my favorites from others in this thread have not been sharp, have had noise, maybe not always hit focus, but they still capture a moment or tell a story, and would take that over a sharp noise free picture of something that just looks boring.

But each to their own and some people like the other side of photography.
 
snerkler said:
Noise I can handle with shots like these but the colour and clarity's just bloody awful..
Click to expand...

The colour and clarity are only 'awful' because you are wanting them to look like they would if taken in brighter light. The colour photos look(ed) fine to me.(y)
 
snerkler said:
Yeah, the other tog had a 50mm f1.8 and faired better. I was going to invest in a 50mm f1.4 instead of the 24-70mm and part of me wished I had, but I don't think I'd have been happy whatever ;)

I might post one showing the great chuffing windows I was shooting against tomorrow. Neither camera liked shooting towards those (it was extremely bright) and both struggled to focus at times, even when the fighters were stationary between rounds :eek: And even if they did focus they're so washed out/lacking in contrast due to the really strong backlight.

But I'll just put it down to experience, and you never know maybe I'll find a couple of shots that work (y)
Click to expand...

Guessing flash is not an option? Might not need much to help a lot and could place quite far back so not distracting.
 
snerkler said:
Yeah, the other tog had a 50mm f1.8 and faired better. I was going to invest in a 50mm f1.4 instead of the 24-70mm and part of me wished I had, but I don't think I'd have been happy whatever ;) (y)
Click to expand...

You know you now need that 58 1.4 you've always promised yourself.
 
photogwannabe said:

D75_5032-NNR by Paul, on Flickr


The Bakkhai (Euripides) by Paul, on Flickr

Hi Snerkeler. (Stupid autocorrect always wants to put Snorkeler!) I've posted these before. The top shot has no noise reduction, the bottom a touch via Noiseware by Imagenomic. Someone previously posted a link to it. Granted absolutely that this wasn't taken at the speed of boxing but it was trash lighting. The point is, the D750 has incredibly fine noise particles and a touch of Noiseware deals with it incredibly well.
Click to expand...
I had a quick play with the noiseware free trial but didn't really know what I was doing and the results were full of horrible artefacts, hopefully I'll have time to watch some tutorials.

siblingchris said:
I've had noiseware pro standalone for years. Worked wonders on some images. Slightly miffed that to get a plugin version for LR or PSE I'd now have to pay more though

Anyway, I've come to the conclusion that less noise doesn't always make a better photo, or necessarily a perfectly sharp one. Those boxing images, I like that last b&w one tbh. It tells a story, the look on the guys face as he's punched, the room, the unexcited audience...

If we are trying to take photos rather than create images then they don't need to be perfect. We don't live in a perfect world....what's today's buzzword? Curators? Maybe we are curators of time, capturing moments
Click to expand...
Thanks. Despite what my previous comments may have come across like, I don't mind a bit of noise in the right scenarios ;)

Ed Sutton said:
The colour and clarity are only 'awful' because you are wanting them to look like they would if taken in brighter light. The colour photos look(ed) fine to me.(y)
Click to expand...
Thanks.

kingo15 said:
Stop being a fussy f****e @snerkler the more you play with them the worse they will look. They look good in black and white
Click to expand...
Me, fussy? Never :oops: :$:oops: :$:oops: :$:p
 
minnnt said:
Just moaned about it all day... :p
Click to expand...
I moaned all day about the light and the quality of my pics (mostly down to my lack of ability) ;) I actually said I was pretty impressed with the noise handling :p
 
minnnt said:
So because the noise at iso 84 bazillion was good you decided to add your own in. :D brilliant.
Click to expand...
No I did it as I was going for some gritty film style processing which I thought might work :LOL:
 
Time to say farewell to this thread. I had an Itch that needed scratching.

Have fun and enjoy (y)
 
So what camera u got pal
 
I got nada right now Andrew ... Just bags and lenses ;)
 
In the process of making a waterproof cover for my D750 for use in very wet weather. Anybody else DIYed something like that? I've decided it also needs to be rock-proof (in terms of scrapes and bangs) which doesn't make the waterproofing quite as straightforward!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top