- Messages
- 485
- Name
- Fraser
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Nice, do you also service your own kit? I occasionally think about having a go at a Zeiss 80mm on my Hasselblad as it’s a bit off, but it’s a pretty complex mechanism so I might get it professional attention some time.
Nice!
All is not as it appears!Nice!
I kind of expected you to have bought a 645 6x6 6x7.
None the less, super quality enlarger.
Lens???
LPL 7700 colour was my enlarger of choice.All is not as it appears!
I used to have an LPL C7700 when I was wet printing and it was really nice. I used Nikon lenses with it.
A VG camera esp with 180mm lens for portrait shots...used mine indoors for years on a tripod but really noticed the weight when I started to take it out of doors with prism finder .Just acquired some more RB67 kit. A metered chimney finder, metered prism, spare body and another 6x7 film back.
Have you felt the weight of an RB67 prism? Wow, I wasn't expecting that!
Two of my all time favourite Nikon's, come to think of it I cannot recall ever being disappointed with any I have used. The F4 basic, (my model) was heavy enough without the additional battery pack underneath (as above) would be a load too far for me.
The F4 is a VG camera and my only complaints (for me only) are:- why didn't they copy Canon for viewfinder display info i.e lit up in red and camera can't fire with the back open (handy for testing etc).
Yes, I agree with that.The F4 is a VG camera and my only complaints (for me only) are:- why didn't they copy Canon for viewfinder display info i.e lit up in red and camera can't fire with the back open (handy for testing etc).
Two of my all time favourite Nikon's, come to think of it I cannot recall ever being disappointed with any I have used. The F4 basic, (my model) was heavy enough without the additional battery pack underneath (as above) would be a load too far for me.
The Nikon F4 was in my view an all together better camera, and arguably better made too. Look how many of the equivalent Canon pro Eos 1 and 1N models appear for sale (very few)and I have owned one of each model! Compared to the Eos1/1n, they, the F4's just soldier on, some as rough as old boots having had a hard life, but are still good. They don't need different coloured lights in the displays nor do they need the the camera back to be closed to test the shutter, press photographers used then - didn't play with them. If it was faulty then it was repaired professionally because it was a hard working tool used by the press and others.The F4 is a VG camera and my only complaints (for me only) are:- why didn't they copy Canon for viewfinder display info i.e lit up in red and camera can't fire with the back open (handy for testing etc).
Well I compare slr cameras to my Canon T90 with 300TL flash (together wow) and also the T70, the only fault I can find for the T90 is that it doesn't have dioptre adjustment but I've bought a +2 dioptre that slides on the viewfinder...of course the T90 doesn't have AF and bought the F4 for AF (to try it out) as it will also take my old non AI lenses that my F90x couldn't.....but I like taking two cameras (for backup) and a VG Nikon combo would be the F4 and FM or instead of the FM maybe a screw lens camera like Pentax?The Nikon F4 was in my view an all together better camera, and arguably better made too. Look how many of the equivalent Canon pro Eos 1 and 1N models appear for sale (very few)and I have owned one of each model! Compared to the Eos1/1n, they, the F4's just soldier on, some as rough as old boots having had a hard life, but are still good. They don't need different coloured lights in the displays nor do they need the the camera back to be closed to test the shutter, press photographers used then - didn't play with them. If it was faulty then it was repaired professionally because it was a hard working tool used by the press and others.
Ah a Nikon man? when cameras and lenses were going for peanuts I became a "everything man" and really should have concentrated on the best lenses and cameras for just a few makes. Anyway when film and development were very cheap did enjoy testing cameras and lenses and was a great hobby and amazingly the T70 turned out to be the camera I use most over the last 10 yearsI have graduated from my F4 so that I could use the later (No apperture ring lenses) and bought an F6 about 12 years ago when the prices of film cameras were still falling. I supplemented that with a very, very late almost mint F2a and together, using my old lenses on the F2a and the newer lenses on the F6 almost anything is within my scope.
The F4 was a workhorse designed with the press in mind, so if it was not used (thrashed) it may well stiffen up - a bit like my knees.Ah a Nikon man? when cameras and lenses were going for peanuts I became a "everything man" and really should have concentrated on the best lenses and cameras for just a few makes. Anyway when film and development were very cheap did enjoy testing cameras and lenses and was a great hobby and amazingly the T70 turned out to be the camera I use most over the last 10 years
The Nikon F4 (and T90) do have faults if not used and stored as my first F4 (mint and boxed) the shutter didn't work and took a gamble buying it cheap...but gave up trying to get it to work and it's still in bits to see if I could get the shutter mechanism to "unstick".