I took the big Fuji out on a bike ride this afternoon, and I'm not quite so impressed with it. It didn't fit that well in my favourite camera bag, I could feel it on my back, whereas I don't notice with my X-T2.
However, I would be prepared to overlook that if the autofocus had been great, but I was left disappointed. I only shot two riders on one corner, 11 photos of my son - none in focus and 7 of a friend with 1 sharp and 2 others usable. I was in "bicycle" subject detection mode, and all of the pictures had the focus box over the riders face. Reviewing the images on the back of the camera they all have "Face detected" displayed. So I'm not sure why the hit rate was so low - my X-T2 would have been better!
This was the one photo I was happy with:
Partho at Sherwood Pines by
Lewis Craik, on Flickr
I'll have more opportunities to experiment tomorrow, so will try without subject detection, but currently, I am not overly impressed.
When I first saw the X-H1 then I was sceptical of the size.
It's a ridiculously nice camera to use. I'd jump at a X-H2 or X-H2S if the prices fell - but I don't think we'll see that happen in the way that it did with the X-H1 because this time round Fuji got the launch schedule in the model range better sorted.
One of my objections to the X-H2/X-H2S was the loss of the ISO dial. But now that I carry the X-H1 as my main body I've got used to the idea that with the control wheels configured then top display takes over from the physical dial legends.
I do think size is an issue. I moves from MFT to Fuji because the MFT lenses and bodies were bulking up. I started with an X-T30 which is really neat in combination with the likes of the 18-55 and the 35mm F1.4 and other small lenses. My main travel carry for visits to cities now is X-H1 + 8-16 which I love as a combo but is just utterly utterly bonkers in terms if size and weight - particularly for APS-C. I can't help feeling it's a Fuji plot to ease the journey to the GFX family and make it all seem so logical and sensible.
I was expecting to hate the handling on the X-H2S, but actually don't mind it - I think I'd prefer it if ISO selection was displayed on the top LCD, as well as the main screen when setting ISO.
I effectively went X-H1 to GFX, with ‘sensible’ choice of lenses, the weight increase is minimal (I had X -H1, 16-55F2.8 and 50-140F2.8), the increase in bulk though is quite significant, but all of this is more than offset by the IQ.
I think the problem Fuji have now is converting people from DSLR to their system especially when cameras like the Canon R6 are a very similar price to the X-H2S.
But at the end of the day it boils down to what you want to shoot, and the lens focal lengths required- having decided that, it’s down to brand/package/weight - it’s difficult to buy a bad camera these days, but it’s all to easy to buy the wrong one for your needs!!!
Fuji seem to be nailing customer service at the moment, where I'm hearing complaints about Canon/Nikon. I am tempted to borrow an R6/70-200 for a weekend and see how I get on with that, but currently I'm leaning back towards the X-T5.
Edit - scrub that last bit, I've just seen how expensive Canon RF lenses are! Canon RF 70-200f2.8 is twice the price of the Fuji 50-140f2.8!