D
Deleted member 49549
Guest
Glantz is a well known anti-ecig campaigner. I've seems lots of crap from him. Yes there are trace amounts of harmful stuff in vapour, but they rarely mention that they're at levels way below recommended max daily exposure levels, or that NRTs have exactly the same traces elements. One Prof Farsalinos article noted that the study which identified formaldehyde in ecig vapour actually showed that they produce less formaldehyde than human respiration does naturally.
There were two articles in the Lancet this week. One in favour of medical regulation and one against. The anti-med regs piece (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(13)70124-3/fulltext?_eventId=login) made a lot more sense.
I do feel the tide is beginning to turn. Even tobacco control professionals are starting to recognise that harm reduction offers benefits for the smokers that haven't already stopped (the hard core) and that medical regulation will stifle development of ecig technology. That's from a group who exist on Pharma funding. There's a very good video here: http://j.mp/132kNBU
Hi John - what are NRT's?
Also, do you have a copy of the Lancet articles? I can't read from the link you posted - cheers.