Thanks, Marsha. I have cropped out the white bit (was the brand logo catching the light) and uploaded a new version.Pack is superb, love those eyes It did make me chuckle too as my cat couldn't stay our of our suitcases! I would crop that little white bit out too.
Thanks Michael.Colour, Very nice, never mind about angles, the colour is really nice and vibrant, I like it a lot.
Well, I have taken very similar shots myself before, which was why I was a bit disappointed. It can be hard though, with such limited depth of field, to get something that looks good.Hi Nat, I missed colour earlier. It definitely fits the theme I wouldn't worry about it having been done before, I guess all our shots have been done before by someone! I always think, well it hasn't been done by me
Thanks, Andy.Hi, Nat, missed a few :nono:
Some crackers here
Spread, nice, clean and bright photograph. Crisp BG and great depth. No crit from me on this one.
Together, B&W was a good choice and nice flowing sense. Good tones and detail. Eye contact would have been good and the cushion with what looks like a reptile skin pattern on draws my eye a tad.
Pack, great eye contact and catchlights. Just a tad off the top for me.
Art, another cracker and the hole is amazing. I saw loads of these on a recent trip to Bridlington. Amazing how the water creates a hole in the rock over millenia. I'd like to see a tad more DOF as the OOF lower left draws my eye. I really like how you've left some colour in the hole as opposed to all white.
Colour, vibrant, well composed and there's a natural yellow vignetting. Think I'll revisit this one because I can't make my mind up about the slight 'flaw' in the lower left petal.
Overall, really good show
Cheers.
Mark... You are WAY too kind! :nono:Hi Nathalie, sorry I've not commented for a while. Hoping to make amends
Age is such a clever take, and a very original way to photograph it; stunning!
Natural; you excel at these close up shots. I'd love to do as well; very very nice indeed.
Spread says "sprinkle" to me more than spread, but who cares, it's a lovely photo!
Together; what can I say - brill! Can't fault it.
Pack; wow, even better! How on earth did you get your cat to pose so perfectly? Stunning eyes.
Art; it's interesting that you've not tried to photograph a piece of art, rather create one. I love it - fantastic colours.
Colour; now I really hate you (not really really, just pretend really!). That is perfection. Nothing else to stay!
Thanks, Marsha. I have cropped out the white bit (was the brand logo catching the light) and uploaded a new version.
Well, I have taken very similar shots myself before, which was why I was a bit disappointed. It can be hard though, with such limited depth of field, to get something that looks good.
I can't even find this OOF patch you're referring to? :shrug: But you're of course entitled to your opinion... We don't like the same things, and that's okay.Color...now , I really want to like this as the colors are simply wonderful and the angle spot on ( there's a limited number of ways to shot a flower close up so don't beat yourself up over it ) ....but....the oof patch on the rhs of the centre lets it down for me . Daresay it's down to the angle & the f4.5 , having seen some stunning flower shots from you both here & on flickr I don't think this is one of your best . Don't mean to sound harsh , just saying it as I see it....sorry
I can't even find this OOF patch you're referring to? :shrug: But you're of course entitled to your opinion... We don't like the same things, and that's okay.
I'm not offended, only surprised that something which I can't see even after it's been pointed out to me, is enough of an issue to make the photo substandard. There's no need to email it to me. If I can't see it after all this time staring at it, that's more than good enough for me. It's not an issue as far as I'm concerned.Oh pants...I had a feeling my post woudn't go down to well...I never meant to take offence . I've drawn a line round the area I was talking about but not sure about posting the image as you edit not ticked . I would like to show you what I'm talking about so maybe I could email it to you ? Of course it may just be my eyesight ..........
Alan & John, thanks for commenting. Just to clarify -- there's very little of the image that is actually IN focus; only a small part of the centre and then the part of the petals that happened to fall within the plane of focus. I'm sure you know this, but I shot it like this on purpose -- the entire centre was never meant to be in focus.I see the point that Lynne is making as the lhs of the centre has about 3 'rows' of rosettes oof and the rhs of the centre has about 5 rows oof, yet the petals to the right are in better focus. This may have more to do with the natural irregularities in the flower and the domed nature of it rather than your technique. It certainly does not make the photo substandard and is a minor issue.
Don't apologize! You were perfectly polite about itOh, I am sorry that I did not understand your intentions.
It's a candle lantern, with star-shaped holes along the top. I took it with the macro lens and unfortunately, the edges were quite uneven when you got really close!Interesting.... I'm kinda intrigued by what is glowing in the first one... and in fact how you shot it... (black card, with a star hole cut in it ?)
A bunch of the tree decorations have already mysteriously disappeared...I much prefer the look and feel of the second shot, although, for me, it's less about the glow (although the one light that's nearly in focus is clearly glowing, and the diffused glow of the others is there too... and more about the cat, the Cat is lovely mind you and the look says it all... (I can just picture the cat trying to work out the angles for getting to a shiny thing up at the top of the tree
Thank you!Hi Nat, that second shot is smashing! The lighting is simply incredible; you've managed to get a subtle glow on the cat's face as well as the more obvious glow of the lights themselves. Perfect