As many of you will know (and can see from my Sig below), I've been a happy user of Micro four thirds for over a decade now and it's a great system with some very high tech bodies and some superb lenses. However......
Now first, this isn't a micro four thirds bashing exercise at all, (as like I say, having used the system for so long know, I feel I have a decent understand of it's strengths and weaknesses). I am finding myself more and more lately questioning the relevance and price point of the system (new) in 2024, and would like to know other peoples thoughts. This all started a few months ago when I wanted a better camera for video, but also wanted something still small and light. After a lot of debate I purchased a Sony A6700. Yes, I know it's got a few issues (which I'll come on to later), but suddenly I had a camera much smaller and lighter than my OM-1 (even with lenses), that had an APS-C sized 26MP sensor, could shoot 4K full width up to 60p and 4k 120 (with an additional 1.5 crop) all of these in 10 bit 422 colour space. And the AF of the Sony and AI subject recognition is simply awesome and the resultant videos are just sublime - and to me at least, put the ones from the OM-1 to shame. I know video isn't something everyone shoots, but it's becoming more and more part of what I shoot these days (I'd hazard I now shoot more video that stills).
Now, the A6700 is much cheaper (up to half the price grey market) but for a reason. Whilst it's Sony's flagship APS-C body, and has a great sensor and state of the art AF (from the A7R V), it's not without it's issues. Low res viewfinder and rear screen, only 1 card slot, no AF joystick and inferior IBIS to M4/3 bodies. But it got me thinking, if you look at something like the A7RV full frame body which is a 61mp FF sensor, it still shoots 26mp in APS-C mode, and has everything (and more) that the A6700 is missing in a body that's only fractionally larger than the OM-1, and weighing only just over 100g more, and costing (grey at least) only about £500 more than the £2100 OMS want for the OM-1 (obviously this varies depending on where you purchase your equipment), then are bodies like that starting to really stretch micro four thirds ?
There are things about M4/3 that we all know and love that the FF bodies don't have (yet), i.e. great IBIS, sometimes (though not always) smaller and lighter lenses, their speed (FPS etc), pro-capture in Raw, Live ND, Live Time , Live ND, Live Grad ND etc, but with FF and APS-C bodies getting smaller along with some of the lenses, it makes me wonder how long M4/3 can survive as primarily a Wildlife and action speciality system ? I'd love M4/3 to be around still in 10 years from now, but OMS (if I'm honest) don't inspire me with confidence that they will survive the FF onslaught.
I have to say that honestly, since getting my Sony APS-C system, (and obviously having an extensive Nikon Z FF system) I haven't picked up my Olympus system in over 2 months now, and I don't really feel I'm missing that much anymore ?
Thoughts of the group please ?