I suspect I'll be shooting wide much of the time, hence the pancake option.
fidsey79 said:Ps, you have to put pics up here asap when you get back!
How do folks find the G1 generally? There've been a few for sale recently with 14-45 lens for very reasonable money, I'm tempted more by the lens than body!
Never mind that, get it on the G1 and show us some pics!!!!
Damn, just looked at a review, it does look quite interesting! I'm aware this is supremely lazy, but anyone got any idea of the used value of a G1 & 14-45?Danny_Two said:Fine for me, never had any real complaints and never felt held back by it. As long as your not shooting fast moving objects and never need more than 800 iso its great.
Give us a chance, i've only just got it out of the box.
Damn, just looked at a review, it does look quite interesting! I'm aware this is supremely lazy, but anyone got any idea of the used value of a G1 & 14-45?
Danny_Two said:I went around the world with just my 14-45 and my 20mm, never wanted for anything more, in fact I could of lived without the 20mm.
It's down to your style really, personally I never need long lenses and just sold my 45-200, if you want versatility have a look at the 14-140.
Probably a dumb question, but what is the main benefit of getting the 20/1.7 over just using the kit lens at around 20mm?
I'm not really thinking about portrait photography at all as I'm more into photographing vistas/buildings etc with the odd picture of me and my wife in said places.
This is great info, many thanks I really need to do some research into these bodies, my GF2 seems to have sparked something off...There's a G1 body for sale in the TP classifieds for £130, which I think is quite reasonable.
Kit lenses usually go for less than £100.
I've never seen one of the great 14-45 kit lenses go for less than £130 but maybe I've not spent enough time looking.There's a G1 body for sale in the TP classifieds for £130, which I think is quite reasonable.
Kit lenses usually go for less than £100.
With the Canon equipment I have been using, I only ever used the native ISO settings i.e. 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 etc. What are the native ISO settings with the GH2? Is it the same, or is it ISO160, 320 etc? I've found over the years that sticking to the native settings gives better results.
Nice pics JJ , sounds like you are pleased
srhmoto said:A photo from my first time out with my GH2 + 100-300mm lens.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/srhmoto/6273272069/
Thorpe_Perrow_001 by srhphoto, on Flickr
Just blown away by the performance of the combination. This was taken at 300mm with the lens wide open.
Cheers,
Simon.
Wow, taken wide open! I want one now, damn you