Brilliant, but I am afraid our house is the little hut in the bottom right pic.Just for a second I thought that big white building was the family house in Italy, until I recognised it as Kenwood House!
Brilliant, but I am afraid our house is the little hut in the bottom right pic.
Great shot. Looks brilliant in the frame.My wife seemed happy with the final framed print of Alfie - XE1 & Viltrox 85.
Framed by APM Photography, on Flickr
Merry Christmas to you all..!!
Pete
It is a money pit and we cannot get there anywhere near as often as I would like, but I am so grateful to have it, I'll admit. If my wife ever lets me retire there I plan to host (but not lead, don't worry) photographic tours as it is such a beautiful place.Who wouldn't want a cottage in Italy?!
Just waiting for the 29th like the rest of us . Great picture.
Or black and white version?
View attachment 339070
Or black and white version?
View attachment 339070
Black and whiteOr black and white version?
View attachment 339070
Black and White for me. Especially this pic
Black & White for me Donna, "Excellent" low light Fujigraph, pushes all the right buttons for me.
Thanks. I was tending to favour the black and white myself but appreciated.Black and white
It depends very much on your requirements and budget. Do you prefer a shoulder bag, a sling style bag, a back pack? Budget? Amazon do a lot of reasonably priced camera bags for each of those categories. Lowepro, Manfrotto, Think Tank, Billingham etc. are more expensive better quality options. Only you can answer the question based on your needs. I have about 10 bags that are used regularly for different needs from single camera/lens holsters for travelling light to full backpacks for when I need to take everything out with me.X-H1, vintage 200mm F4 [not very big, Nikon AI] plus adapter, Laowa 65mm macro, Fuji XC35 F2 .... standard flash , rocket blower, spare batts and a bit of spare room [in case of [very likely] another lens or flash]
What bag?
If you lay the kit out on the floor/or table, as to how it would be packed. It might give a better clue.X-H1, vintage 200mm F4 [not very big, Nikon AI] plus adapter, Laowa 65mm macro, Fuji XC35 F2 .... standard flash , rocket blower, spare batts and a bit of spare room [in case of [very likely] another lens or flash]
What bag?
X-H1, vintage 200mm F4 [not very big, Nikon AI] plus adapter, Laowa 65mm macro, Fuji XC35 F2 .... standard flash , rocket blower, spare batts and a bit of spare room [in case of [very likely] another lens or flash]
What bag?
Thanks very much for that, much appreciated. I'll do some thinking. I'd had the feeling that it was bigger and heavier so hadn't paid much attention to it.Barely any difference in size or weight. I keep a 12mm, 18-55mm, and 55-200mm in my "take everywhere" bag - I just removed the 55-200mm and put this in it's place without moving dividers etc.
I've got no way to accurately test the AF, but it does feel snappier for what it's worth. It's certainly quieter and seems more "confident". OIS seems much more effective - at 300mm I can handhold at speeds which were my limit on the 55-200mm.
Build quality is excellent. Where the 55-200mm is built from premium materials, it ultimately feels quite delicate - This is the opposite. It's plastic, but feels like you could throw it down the stairs. There's no flexing, creaking, or rattles. It feels solid. The hood is also much better, though the one on the 55-200mm was not hard to improve upon - They appear to have completely redesigned the mechanism, it feels much more sturdy now.
Focus and zoom rings feel much better than the 55-200mm, and the aperture ring is much firmer - I tend to adjust by reaching across and wheeling it with my right middle finger while holding the camera in shooting position, but it's a struggle to do that with this one. That's not a bad thing though. No chance of accidentally changing it, and it just adds to the premium feel.
Optically, I can't compare it since my 55-200mm was faulty. It certainly seems very sharp to me throughout the range even wide open. If I were really pixel peeping, it may be a little weaker at the very limit of the long end (past around 250mm), but still very good even then. I haven't noticed any flaring or CA in any of my shots so far. The only drawback reviews talk about is the onion ring bokeh when specular lights are out of focus. I've just tested against some sparkly tinsel at the other end of the room and while it won't win any awards, it certainly isn't going to ruin your photo's that's for sure. This test shot was at 300mm wide open -
View attachment 338800
Oh, and an honourable mention to the minimum focus distance. This thing is really good for close up work.
View attachment 338805
Hope that helps!
For anyone hunting shutter counts on their Fuji`s.
I found this great little place...
https://greybeard.org.uk/exif/
I Just tried it, and it`s super easy, and works with either jpeg or raw files. It`s all done in browser, so no uploading or downloading. Clicking on the thumbnail also gives you the focus point.
Photos from my X-E2 show Shutter Count: N/A. Not sure if the site doesn't support it or if it's just too old.
Various sources seem pretty certain we have a 40MP stacked sensor on the way in two new bodies. XH-2 which will be like the A9 and be great for sports/action plus a more video centric body, personally I’m bloody excited by this !!!! Almost grabbed a GFX 50Sii today but then heard about the stacked sensor.
I actually think you’d make better use of the GFX than me with your brilliant still life workI too am very interested in the H2, but will wait and see if there are any issues before jumping in. I got bitten with the Nikon D750 debacle, so won`t be rushing out again to get a just released body.
As for the GFX 50Sii .... in my dreams. But would be totally wasted on me
I actually think you’d make better use of the GFX than me with your brilliant still life work